← All companies

Chainalysis

Blockchain analytics platform that traces cryptocurrency flows to detect illicit activity, provide compliance tools, and support law enforcement investigations.

CryptoUnited States·Founded 2014·ISO/NSO equity·chainalysis.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
Reference estimate only
4 methods · Source-audited Jun 12, 2026Low confidence (33%)

The four valuation methods disagree significantly (3.5× spread). Treat this as a wide reference range only — not a reliable point estimate.

$8.6B
wide range · ~$6B – ~$10B
Implied per-share: $34.3 · vs last primary -8%

No verified public secondary-market signal available for Chainalysis. The estimate relies on last confirmed financing, peer multiples, sector momentum, and time decay.

Valuation basis:Last primary roundSource-audited Jun 12, 2026
Last primary round
$8.6B
Series F · 50mo ago
Secondary signal
No verified secondary signal

No verified public secondary signal is available. Hiive/Forge links are monitoring links only, not evidence of a current executable price.

Headcount
900
employees · LinkedIn-10%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$250M
annual run rate · est.

Last primary was Series F at $8.6B (May 2022). No new confirmed primary equity round since. A Hiive bid implying ~$7.4B was noted in Oct 2025 but current secondary market pricing indicates significant discount from the 2022 primary — treat valuation as stale.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source verification: TechCrunch May 2022 · $8.6B Series F · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorCryptohigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2014high
Websitechainalysis.comhigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$8.6Bhigh
Round nameSeries Fhigh
Date2022-05-10 (50 months ago)high
Lead investorGIC Singaporehigh
Amount raised$170Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares230Mlow
Implied share price (illustrative only)~$34low
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$250Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)34.4xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)900medium
Employees (12 months ago)1,000medium
12-month headcount growth-10%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyBLOKmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)24%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$8.6Blatest · Series F
Total growth
172×
Our estimate
$7.9B
$0.0B$2.5B$5.1B$7.6B$10.1BSeries ASeries BSeries CSeries D$4.2BSeries ElatestSeries Fest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series F+105%2022-05-10
$8.6B
Led by GIC Singapore · raised $170M
Series E+110%2021-06-10
$4.2B
Led by Addition · raised $100M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2021(historical ref.)
Series D+100%2021-03-26
$2.0B
Led by Paradigm · raised $100M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2021(historical ref.)
Series C+400%2020-06-01
$1.0B
Led by Benchmark · raised $49M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2020(historical ref.)
Series B+300%2019-07-02
$0.2B
Led by Benchmark · raised $30M
Source: TechCrunch Jul 2019(historical ref.)
Series A2018-01-01
$0.1B
Led by Benchmark · raised $16M
Source: Crunchbase(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$7.4B
Bid
$6.5B$7.1B$7.7B$8.3B2025-10

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2025-10-01bidHiive

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
COINCoinbase Global, Inc.6.64x
HOODRobinhood Markets, Inc.22.47x
MSTRStrategy Inc68.49x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $6.1B66% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 32.5x → 25% private-company discount → 24.4x on $250M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%suppressed20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.6B round (2022-05-10) × 2.14× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 4.2 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%suppressed10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.6B × (1 + 24% p.j.)^4.2yr = $21.1B via BLOK ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
33%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Low

Worked example for an employee

Illustrative mechanics only — this shows how the equity model works, not a reliable value estimate.

Illustrative mechanics only

This example shows equity mechanics only. It is not a reliable estimate of current value because model support is weak (confidence 33%, spread 3.5×).

Show illustrative values (not a reliable estimate) ▸
Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Chainalysis 24 months ago (2024-07-10) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$34
weighted average of 4 methods — low confidence
Gross vested value
$34,252
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$34,252
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$3,878
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$38,719
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$19,980
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$29,114
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These illustrative values use the same calculation engine as the live calculator, but the underlying model is low-confidence for Chainalysis. Use your own numbers as a starting point only. Try the calculator →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
230M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Chainalysis we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
20% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
BLOK @ 24%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of BLOK as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Chainalysis. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.