← All companies

Databricks

Data & AI platform — Delta Lake, MLflow, Unity Catalog, plus the Mosaic foundation-model stack. Series L closed Feb 9, 2026 at $134B. Revenue run rate surpassed $5.4B (+65% YoY).

Data/Cloud🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2013ISO/NSO equitydatabricks.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 18, 2026 (8d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 18, 2026High confidence (65%)
$118.5B
range $86.1B – $150.8B
Implied per-share: $124.7 · vs last primary -12%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$134B
Series L · 3mo ago
Secondary signal
$134.0B
Forge · 2026-04+0%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
8,000
employees · LinkedIn+18%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$5.4B
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorData/Cloudhigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2013high
Websitedatabricks.comhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$134Bhigh
Round nameSeries Lhigh
Date2026-02-09 (3 months ago)high
Lead investorGoldman Sachs / Morgan Stanleyhigh
Amount raised$7.0Bmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares950Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$125medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$5,400Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)24.8xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)8,000medium
Employees (12 months ago)6,800medium
12-month headcount growth+18%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyWCLDmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)2%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$134Blatest · Series L
Total growth
4×
Our estimate
$118B
$0.0B$39.5B$79.1B$119B$158B$38.0BSeries H$43.0BSeries I$62.0BSeries JlatestSeries Lest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series L+116%2026-02-09
$134.0B
Led by Goldman Sachs / Morgan Stanley · raised $7.0B
Source: CNBC Feb 2026
Series J+44%2024-12-17
$62.0B
Led by Andreessen Horowitz · raised $10.0B
Source: Bloomberg Dec 2024
Series I+13%2023-09-14
$43.0B
Led by T. Rowe Price · raised $500M
Source: TechCrunch
Series H2021-08-31
$38.0B
Led by Counterpoint · raised $1.6B
Source: Reuters

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$134B+116% vs first recorded
Bid
Trade
Tender
$49.0B$81.4B$114B$147B2025-042025-072025-102026-022026-04

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-04-08tradeForge$141
2026-02-09tenderHiive$141
2025-10-15tradeForge$88

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CFLTConfluent7x
DDOGDatadog, Inc.21.55x
ESTCElastic N.V.3.38x
MDBMongoDB, Inc.10.66x
NETCloudflare, Inc.32.81x
SNOWSnowflake Inc.12.74x

Typical strike prices by cohort

Strike ranges by cohort: aggregated from Glassdoor, Teamblind threads, Carta's published industry data and reports from employees. Indicative only — your actual 409A at grant time is the only authoritative number.

2021 cohort
$35–$55
per share
2022 cohort
$40–$60
per share
2023 cohort
$45–$65
per share
2024 cohort
$60–$80
per share
2025 cohort
$85–$110
per share

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $80.2B75% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 16.5x → 10% private-company discount → 14.8x on $5400M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $116.9B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 5 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $152.8B79% confidence
$134B round (2026-02-09) × 1.16× growth × 0.99× multiple decay over 0.3 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $134.7B56% confidence
$134B × (1 + 2% p.j.)^0.3yr = $134.7B via WCLD ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
65%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
High

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Databricks 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options at a strike price of $70/share, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$125
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$124,688
vested shares × implied price
Exercise cost
$70,000
1,000 × $70 strike
Net of exercise
$54,688
gross − exercise cost
Tax (rough)
$7,084
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$70,952
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$2,735
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$35,985
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
950M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
10% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Databricks we use 10% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
65% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
WCLD @ 2%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of WCLD as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Databricks. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.