← All companies

N26

German mobile bank offering checking accounts, savings, investments, and crypto to 8M+ customers across 24 European markets and the US.

FintechGermany·Founded 2013·RSU equity·n26.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source review Jun 2026 — source URL pending
Reference estimate only
4 methods · Source review Jun 2026 — source URL pendingLow confidence (22%)

The four valuation methods disagree significantly (14.2× spread). Treat this as a wide reference range only — not a reliable point estimate.

$9B
Range suppressed — methods disagree too widely (14.2× spread)
Implied per-share: $37.7 · vs last primary 0%

No verified public secondary-market signal available for N26. The estimate relies on last confirmed financing, peer multiples, sector momentum, and time decay.

Valuation basis:Last primary roundSource review Jun 2026 — source URL pending
Last primary round
$9B
Series E · 57mo ago
Secondary signal
No verified secondary signal

No verified public secondary signal is available. Hiive/Forge links are monitoring links only, not evidence of a current executable price.

Headcount
1,500
employees · LinkedIn-12%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$250M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source review: key primary-round source URL still pending. Figures are retained as historical reference and marked low-confidence where applicable.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorFintechhigh
HeadquartersGermanyhigh
Founded2013high
Websiten26.comhigh
Last primary round
Post-money valuation$9Bmedium
Round nameSeries Ehigh
Date2021-10-15 (57 months ago)high
Lead investorThird Point Ventureshigh
Amount raised$900Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares240Mlow
Implied share price (illustrative only)~$38low
Primary equity type grantedRSUhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$250Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)36.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)1,500medium
Employees (12 months ago)1,700medium
12-month headcount growth-12%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyFINXmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)14%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$9.0Blatest · Series E
Total growth
45×
$0.0B$2.7B$5.3B$8.0B$10.6BSeries BSeries C$3.5BSeries D$3.5BSeries D (ext…latestSeries E
Primary round
Down round
Series E+157%2021-10-15
$9.0B
Led by Third Point Ventures · raised $900M
Source: FT Oct 2021(source URL pending)
Series D (ext.)+0%2021-01-12
$3.5B
Led by Coatue Management · raised $100M
Source: TechCrunch Jan 2021(historical ref.)
Series D+379%2019-07-01
$3.5B
Led by Tencent / Insight Partners · raised $470M
Source: FT Jul 2019(historical ref.)
Series C+265%2018-01-10
$0.7B
Led by Allianz / Tencent · raised $160M
Source: TechCrunch Jan 2018(historical ref.)
Series B2016-03-01
$0.2B
Led by Horizons Ventures · raised $40M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2016(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

No active listings found

We monitor Hiive, Forge Global, and EquityZen for N26 listings. As of July 2026, no verified secondary market activity has been recorded.

Secondary listings for private companies appear without announcement and typically close within days. When a listing appears, it often signals an upcoming tender offer or funding round.

Primary round history as valuation signal

In the absence of secondary market data, the funding history below is the primary valuation anchor. Method C (time-decay) uses this data to estimate current value.

Series E · 2021-10$9B
Series D (ext.) · 2021-01$3.5B
Series D · 2019-07$3.5B

Get notified when a listing appears

Pro subscribers get notified within 2 hours when a secondary listing for N26 is detected. Most employees first hear about tender offers days after the market already knows.

Get listing alerts →

Check directly: Hiive ↗ · Forge Global ↗ · SEC Form D ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
GPNGlobal Payments Inc.2.26x
MAMastercard Incorporated13.53x
NUNu Holdings Ltd.8.5x
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.5.82x
VVisa Inc.15.36x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%suppressed23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 6.8x → 25% private-company discount → 5.1x on $250M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($9B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%suppressed20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$9B round (2021-10-15) × 2.37× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 4.7 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%suppressed10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$9B × (1 + 14% p.j.)^4.7yr = $16.7B via FINX ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
22%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Low

Worked example for an employee

Illustrative mechanics only — this shows how the equity model works, not a reliable value estimate.

Illustrative mechanics only

This example shows equity mechanics only. It is not a reliable estimate of current value because model support is weak (confidence 22%, spread 14.2×).

Show illustrative values (not a reliable estimate) ▸
Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined N26 24 months ago (2024-07-10) with 2,000 units, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$38
weighted average of 4 methods — low confidence
Gross vested value
$37,673
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$37,673
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$4,289
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$42,587
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$21,976
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$32,022
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These illustrative values use the same calculation engine as the live calculator, but the underlying model is low-confidence for N26. Use your own numbers as a starting point only. Try the calculator →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
240M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for N26 we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
20% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
FINX @ 14%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of FINX as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with N26. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.