← All companies

Nuro

Autonomous delivery vehicle company operating purpose-built driverless pods for last-mile grocery and restaurant delivery. Raised at $8.6B (Nov 2021, Tiger Global); subsequently cut 70% of workforce in 2023 after scaling challenges. Pivoted to licensing its autonomy stack to OEMs including trucking and agricultural equipment manufacturers. First company to receive NHTSA exemption to operate vehicles without human controls.

AI🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2016ISO/NSO equitynuro.ai
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (36%)
$1.6B
range $0.0B – $17.6B⚠ methods disagree (42.9× spread)
Implied per-share: $5.3 · vs last primary -82%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$8.6B
Growth · 55mo ago
Secondary signal
$1.6B
Forge · 2026-04-82%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
300
employees · LinkedIn-63%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$25M
annual run rate · est.

Significant restructuring in 2023: 70%+ workforce reduction; pivoted from delivery operations to autonomy stack licensing. Current value substantially below $8.6B peak.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorAIhigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2016high
Websitenuro.aihigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$8.6Bhigh
Round nameGrowthhigh
Date2021-11-01 (55 months ago)high
Lead investorTiger Globalhigh
Amount raised$600Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares300Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$5medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$25Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)344.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)300medium
Employees (12 months ago)800medium
12-month headcount growth-63%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyBOTZmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)22%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$8.6Blatest · Growth
Total growth
21×
Our estimate
$1.6B
$0.0B$2.5B$5.1B$7.6B$10.1BSeries A$2.7BSeries B$5.1BSeries ClatestGrowthest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Growth+69%2021-11-01
$8.6B
Led by Tiger Global · raised $600M
Source: Bloomberg Nov 2021
Series C+89%2021-03-01
$5.1B
Led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2 · raised $500M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2021
Series B+575%2019-02-12
$2.7B
Led by SoftBank Vision Fund · raised $940M
Source: WSJ Feb 2019
Series A2018-01-01
$0.4B
Led by Greylock Partners · raised $92M
Source: Crunchbase

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$1.6B+8% vs first recorded
Trade
$1.4B$1.5B$1.5B$1.6B2026-022026-04

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-04-25tradeForge$5
2026-02-20tradeHiive$5

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.35.09x
MDBMongoDB, Inc.10.66x
NETCloudflare, Inc.32.81x
NVDANVIDIA Corporation20.57x
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.62.81x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $0.5B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 36.6x → 45% private-company discount → 20.1x on $25M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($2B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $1.5B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $2.0B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.6B round (2021-11-01) × 1.55× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 4.6 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($1.6B → $2.0B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $21.6B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$8.6B × (1 + 22% p.j.)^4.6yr = $21.6B via BOTZ ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
36%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Nuro 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$5
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$5,258
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$5,258
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$526
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$5,943
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$3,067
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$4,469
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
300M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
45% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Nuro we use 45% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
10% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
BOTZ @ 22%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of BOTZ as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Nuro. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.