← All companies

Retool

Low-code platform for building internal business tools — dashboards, admin panels, CRUD apps — by dragging and dropping pre-built UI components connected to any API or database. Series C at $3.2B (Nov 2022, Sequoia Capital); ARR ~$120M with 3,000+ enterprise customers including Amazon, DoorDash, and Brex. Launched Retool AI (LLM integrations) and Retool Mobile in 2024.

SaaS🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2017ISO/NSO equityretool.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (36%)
$3.2B
range $2.0B – $4.3B⚠ methods disagree (5.2× spread)
Implied per-share: $18.6 · vs last primary -1%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$3.2B
Series C · 42mo ago
Secondary signal
$3.2B
Forge · 2026-04+1%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
250
employees · LinkedIn+9%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$120M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorSaaShigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2017high
Websiteretool.comhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$3.2Bhigh
Round nameSeries Chigh
Date2022-11-10 (42 months ago)high
Lead investorSequoia Capitalhigh
Amount raised$45Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares170Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$19medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$120Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)26.7xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)250medium
Employees (12 months ago)230medium
12-month headcount growth+9%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyIGVmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)2%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$3.2Blatest · Series C
Total growth
80×
$0.0B$0.9B$1.9B$2.8B$3.8BSeedSeries A$1.9BSeries BlatestSeries C
Primary round
Down round
Series C+72%2022-11-10
$3.2B
Led by Sequoia Capital · raised $45M
Source: TechCrunch Nov 2022
Series B+520%2021-12-03
$1.9B
Led by Sequoia Capital · raised $90M
Source: TechCrunch Dec 2021
Series A+650%2020-09-01
$0.3B
Led by Sequoia Capital · raised $20M
Source: TechCrunch Sep 2020
Seed2019-04-01
$0.0B
Led by Y Combinator · raised $4.25M
Source: YC

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$3.2B+6% vs first recorded
Trade
$3.0B$3.1B$3.2B$3.3B2026-022026-04

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-04-24tradeForge$19
2026-02-22tradeHiive$18

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
DDOGDatadog, Inc.21.55x
ESTCElastic N.V.3.38x
GTLBGitLab Inc.4.72x
TEAMAtlassian Corporation3.5x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $0.8B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 9.3x → 28% private-company discount → 6.7x on $120M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($3B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $3.2B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $4.2B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$3.2B round (2022-11-10) × 2.53× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 3.5 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($3.2B → $4.2B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $3.4B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$3.2B × (1 + 2% p.j.)^3.5yr = $3.4B via IGV ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
36%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Retool 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$19
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$18,557
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$18,557
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$1,995
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$20,977
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$10,825
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$15,773
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
170M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
28% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Retool we use 28% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
30% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
IGV @ 2%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of IGV as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Retool. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.