← All companies

Together AI

GPU-cloud platform for training and running open-source AI models including LLaMA-3, Mistral, and Mixtral. Series A at $1.25B (Jun 2024, Kleiner Perkins). Positioned as the cost-efficient alternative to hyperscaler inference — 5–10× cheaper per token than Azure/GCP for popular open models. ARR growing triple-digits YoY.

AI🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2022ISO/NSO equitytogether.ai
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026High confidence (56%)
$1.8B
range $1.4B – $2.1B
Implied per-share: $13.5 · vs last primary +40%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$1.25B
Series A · 23mo ago
Secondary signal
$2.0B
Forge · 2026-04+61%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
200
employees · LinkedIn+100%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$50M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorAIhigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2022high
Websitetogether.aihigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$1.25Bhigh
Round nameSeries Ahigh
Date2024-06-12 (23 months ago)high
Lead investorKleiner Perkinshigh
Amount raised$106Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares130Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$14medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$50Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)25.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)200medium
Employees (12 months ago)100medium
12-month headcount growth+100%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyBOTZmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)15%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$1.3Blatest · Series A
Total growth
10×
Our estimate
$1.8B
$0.0B$0.5B$1.0B$1.6B$2.1BSeedlatestSeries Aest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series A+942%2024-06-12
$1.3B
Led by Kleiner Perkins · raised $106M
Source: TechCrunch Jun 2024
Seed2023-03-14
$0.1B
Led by Lux Capital · raised $20M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2023

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$2.0B+11% vs first recorded
Trade
$1.8B$1.9B$2.0B$2.1B2026-022026-04

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-04-22tradeForge$16
2026-02-20tradeHiive$14

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.35.09x
MDBMongoDB, Inc.10.66x
NETCloudflare, Inc.32.81x
NVDANVIDIA Corporation20.57x
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc.62.81x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $1.4B75% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 36.6x → 25% private-company discount → 27.4x on $50M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $1.9B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $2.6B46% confidence
$1.25B round (2024-06-12) × 8.55× growth × 0.90× multiple decay over 2.0 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($2.0B → $2.6B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $1.6B31% confidence
$1.25B × (1 + 15% p.j.)^2.0yr = $1.6B via BOTZ ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
56%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
High

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Together AI 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$14
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$13,508
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$13,508
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$1,389
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$15,270
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$7,880
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$11,482
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
130M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Together AI we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
200% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
BOTZ @ 15%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of BOTZ as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Together AI. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.