← All companies

Webflow

No-code web design and CMS platform that generates production-quality HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without writing code. Series C at $4B (Mar 2022, Silversmith Capital Partners); ARR ~$140M from 200,000+ paying customers including Dell, BBVA, and Zendesk. Positioned at the intersection of design and development — a visual developer tool widely used by marketing and design teams.

SaaS🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2013ISO/NSO equitywebflow.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (40%)
$3.7B
range $0.7B – $6.7B⚠ methods disagree (11.3× spread)
Implied per-share: $20.0 · vs last primary -7%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$4B
Series C · 50mo ago
Secondary signal
$4.2B
Public Report · 2026-05+5%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
900
employees · LinkedIn+13%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$140M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorSaaShigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2013high
Websitewebflow.comhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$4Bhigh
Round nameSeries Chigh
Date2022-03-22 (50 months ago)high
Lead investorSilversmith Capital Partnershigh
Amount raised$120Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares185Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$20medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$140Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)28.6xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)900medium
Employees (12 months ago)800medium
12-month headcount growth+13%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyIGVmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)2%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$4.0Blatest · Series C
Total growth
267×
Our estimate
$3.7B
$0.0B$1.2B$2.4B$3.5B$4.7BSeedSeries A$2.1BSeries BlatestSeries Cest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series C+90%2022-03-22
$4.0B
Led by Silversmith Capital Partners · raised $120M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2022
Series B+275%2021-03-25
$2.1B
Led by Accel · raised $140M
Source: TechCrunch Mar 2021
Series A+3633%2019-09-01
$0.6B
Led by CapitalG (Google Capital) · raised $72M
Source: TechCrunch Sep 2019
Seed2013-07-01
$0.0B
Led by Y Combinator · raised $2.9M
Source: YC

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$4.2B+89% vs first recorded
Ask
Bid
Trade
$1.9B$2.8B$3.6B$4.6B2025-082026-012026-042026-05

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-05-04tradePublic Report$16
2026-04-10tradeHiive$15
2026-01-15bidHiive$15

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
CRMSalesforce, Inc.3.55x
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.3.13x
NOWServiceNow, Inc.7.54x
WDAYWorkday, Inc.3.25x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $0.5B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 4.6x → 25% private-company discount → 3.4x on $140M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($4B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $3.6B70% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 4 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $5.5B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$4B round (2022-03-22) × 2.99× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 4.2 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($4.2B → $5.5B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $4.3B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$4B × (1 + 2% p.j.)^4.2yr = $4.3B via IGV ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
40%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Webflow 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$20
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$20,022
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$20,022
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$2,171
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$22,633
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$11,679
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$17,018
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
185M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Webflow we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
30% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
IGV @ 2%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of IGV as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Webflow. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.