Weights & Biases has been acquired by CoreWeave. This legacy page is kept for historical private-market reference. Deal conversion terms govern actual equity value — check current merger documents.

← All companies

Weights & Biases

MLOps and experiment-tracking platform used by 60%+ of enterprise AI teams globally.

AIUnited States·Founded 2017·ISO/NSO equity·wandb.ai
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Source-audited Jun 12, 2026
No longer a private company

Weights & Biases has exited the private market — see the notice above for the public ticker or acquisition terms. Our 4-method private valuation no longer applies, so we don't show a secondary-market estimate here. The funding history and data below remain for reference.

Acquired by CoreWeave at $1.6B · 2025-05-05
Acquisition value
$1.7B
Acquisition (CoreWeave) · 14mo ago
Acquisition reference
$1.6B
CoreWeave · 2025-05
Headcount
350
employees · LinkedIn+13%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$100M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

Source verification: Bloomberg May 2025 · CoreWeave acquisition $1.55B · manual-source-audit-2026-06

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorAIhigh
HeadquartersUnited Stateshigh
Founded2017high
Websitewandb.aihigh
Acquisition value
Post-money valuation$1.7Bhigh
Round nameAcquisition (CoreWeave)high
Date2025-05-05 (14 months ago)high
Lead investorInsight Partnershigh
Amount raisedNot disclosedmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares59.091Mlow
Historical implied share price (private-market model)$27medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$100Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)17.0xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)350medium
Employees (12 months ago)310medium
12-month headcount growth+13%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxyWCLDmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)3%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$1.7Blatest · Acquisition (CoreWeave)
Total growth
34×
Historical model ref.
$1.6B
$0.0B$0.5B$1.0B$1.5B$2.0BSeries ASeries B$1.3BSeries ClatestAcquisition (…est.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Historical model ref.
Acquisition (CoreWeave)+36%2025-05-05
$1.7B
Led by CoreWeave
Series C+213%2021-10-05
$1.3B
Led by Insight Partners · raised $200M
Source: TechCrunch Oct 2021(historical ref.)
Series B+700%2020-12-01
$0.4B
Led by Felicis · raised $45M
Source: TechCrunch Dec 2020(historical ref.)
Series A2019-08-07
$0.1B
Led by Felicis · raised $8M
Source: TechCrunch Aug 2019(historical ref.)

Secondary market signals

Historical secondary market data for reference. This company has exited the private market.

Company acquired — equity no longer private
Acquired by: CoreWeave
Deal value: $1.6B
Date: 2025-05-05
Source: Bloomberg May 2025

Secondary market monitoring (Hiive/Forge) is only relevant for privately-held equity. For current market value, check the public ticker or deal terms above.

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
DDOGDatadog, Inc.26.08x
ESTCElastic N.V.3.74x
GTLBGitLab Inc.5.69x
TEAMAtlassian Corporation3.72x

Confidence breakdown

Historical private-market model output — shown for reference only. This company has exited the private market; the 4-method estimate below no longer represents current market value.

The numbers below reflect what our private-market model would have estimated before the exit event. They are shown for historical context only and should not be used as current equity values.
Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $0.9B75% confidence
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 11.2x → 22% private-company discount → 8.7x on $100M revenue
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%suppressed25% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
No verified secondary market data available — estimate relies on primary round, peer multiples, and sector momentum.
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $2.3B61% confidence
$1.7B round (2025-05-05) × 1.43× growth × 0.94× multiple decay over 1.2 years
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $1.8B42% confidence
$1.7B × (1 + 3% p.j.)^1.2yr = $1.8B via WCLD ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
46%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 60% is high, 35–60% medium, below 35% low.
Medium

Historical equity model (legacy reference)

Historical private-market calculation for context only. If you hold legacy equity in this company, check the public ticker or deal terms — not this model.

Private-market scenarios disabled

This company is no longer private. Private-market scenario modelling does not apply. Use public filings, broker statements, or exchange data for current equity value.

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
59.090909M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
22% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Weights & Biases we use 22% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
35% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
WCLD @ 3%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of WCLD as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Weights & Biases. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.