← All companies

Whatnot

Live-streaming commerce marketplace for collectibles, sneakers, trading cards, and vintage clothing. Series D at $3.7B (Jul 2022, DST Global); GMV reached ~$2B in 2024, making it one of the fastest-growing e-commerce platforms in the US. Expanded to the UK, Germany, France, and Australia, processing 5M+ auctions per month.

Consumer🇺🇸 United StatesFounded 2019ISO/NSO equitywhatnot.com
Compare ⇄Calculate →
Reviewed May 24, 2026 (2d ago)
Current estimate
4 methods · May 24, 2026Medium confidence (36%)
$2.9B
range $0.2B – $5.7B⚠ methods disagree (12.4× spread)
Implied per-share: $16.4 · vs last primary -20%

This estimate reflects what informed investors are paying on secondary markets like Hiive and Forge — not the 409A valuation on your grant letter.

Last primary round
$3.7B
Series D · 46mo ago
Secondary signal
$3.1B
Hiive · 2026-04-17%

Sourced from Forge/Hiive public data. Full order books require a paid subscription; figures shown are best-effort from public disclosures.

Headcount
500
employees · LinkedIn+25%

LinkedIn count — directional proxy only. Historical figure sourced via Wayback Machine; treat ±15% as normal variance.

Revenue (est.)
$210M
annual run rate · est.

Complete company data

Every input we use, where we got it from, and how much we trust it.

FieldValueConfidence
Company fundamentals
SectorConsumerhigh
Headquarters🇺🇸 United Stateshigh
Founded2019high
Websitewhatnot.comhigh
Latest primary round
Post-money valuation$3.7Bhigh
Round nameSeries Dhigh
Date2022-07-21 (46 months ago)high
Lead investorDST Globalhigh
Amount raised$260Mmedium
Capitalization
Total fully-diluted shares180Mlow
Implied share price (latest primary)$16medium
Primary equity type grantedISO/NSOhigh
Financials
Annual revenue (est.)$210Mmedium
EV / Revenue (implied)17.6xmedium
Headcount
Employees (now)500medium
Employees (12 months ago)400medium
12-month headcount growth+25%medium
Methodology inputs
Sector ETF proxySOCLmedium
ETF annual return (trailing 3-yr)9%medium

Funding history

Primary rounds reported in Bloomberg, WSJ, TechCrunch, Reuters, or SEC Form D filings (efts.sec.gov). Linked per round below.

Valuation progression (equity rounds)
Valuation progression · equity rounds
$3.7Blatest · Series D
Total growth
25×
Our estimate
$2.9B
$0.0B$1.1B$2.2B$3.3B$4.4BSeries ASeries B$1.5BSeries ClatestSeries Dest.Est.
Primary round
Down round
Our estimate
Series D+147%2022-07-21
$3.7B
Led by DST Global · raised $260M
Source: TechCrunch Jul 2022
Series C+200%2022-01-26
$1.5B
Led by Andreessen Horowitz · raised $150M
Source: TechCrunch Jan 2022
Series B+233%2021-07-01
$0.5B
Led by Andreessen Horowitz · raised $50M
Source: TechCrunch Jul 2021
Series A2021-01-01
$0.2B
Led by Y Combinator / a16z · raised $20M
Source: Crunchbase

Secondary market signals

Secondary market signals: bid/ask/trade indications from Hiive (hiive.com), Forge Global, Caplight Index, and tender prices reported in the press.

Implied valuation over time
Implied valuation · secondary market
$3.1B+21% vs first recorded
Trade
Ask
$2.4B$2.7B$2.9B$3.2B2025-112026-04

Forge and Hiive publish aggregated market data publicly, but full order books, individual bids/asks, and confirmed trade prices require a paid account. The figures below are sourced from their public summaries, press-reported tender prices, and SEC disclosures. They represent the best publicly available signal — not a guaranteed executable price.

DateTypeSourcePrice / share
2026-04-01askHiive$17
2025-11-18tradeForge$14

View live indications: Hiive ↗ · SEC Form D filings ↗

Public peer comparables

Public peer comparables: editorial selection of public companies with the closest business model. EV/Revenue and growth from public 10-Q filings and Bloomberg, refreshed quarterly.

TickerCompanyEV / Revenue
EBAYeBay Inc.4.43x
ETSYEtsy, Inc.2.04x
REALThe RealReal, Inc.1.53x
WWayfair Inc.0.7x

Confidence breakdown

How much we trust each of the four valuation methods for this specific company, and why.

Method A — Peer-multiple
weight 25%→ $0.4B23% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
Growth-weighted peer EV/Revenue: 2.6x → 25% private-company discount → 2.0x on $210M revenue. Output implies less than half the recent market anchor ($3B) — this company is likely valued on optionality / non-revenue factors and Method A is structurally less reliable here.
Method B — Secondary-implied
weight 45%→ $2.9B55% confidence
Recency-weighted average of 2 secondary indications (180-day decay)
Method C — Primary time-decay
weight 20%→ $4.0B20% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$3.7B round (2022-07-21) × 3.65× growth × 0.85× multiple decay over 3.8 years — capped at 1.3× recent secondary ($3.1B → $4.0B)
Method D — Sector momentum
weight 10%→ $5.1B10% confidence
↳ Effectively excluded from the blend — this method is structurally unreliable for this company.
$3.7B × (1 + 9% p.j.)^3.8yr = $5.1B via SOCL ETF-proxy
Overall confidence
36%
Weighted average of the four methods. Above 65% is high, 40–65% medium, below 40% low.
Medium

Worked example for an employee

A concrete walk-through using a hypothetical employee profile. Same engine the calculator uses — try it with your real numbers.

Profile: a hypothetical employee who joined Whatnot 24 months ago (2024-05-26) with 2,000 options, on the standard 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
Vesting
1,000 of 2,000
50% vested at month 24
Implied share price (mid)
$16
weighted average of 4 methods
Gross vested value
$16,385
vested shares × implied price
Net value
$16,385
no strike, gross = net
Tax (rough)
$1,734
US federal only · AMT risk: low
What if the next round is…
Up round +30%
$18,522
New round at +30% valuation, 15% new shares issued
Down round −30%
$9,558
New round at −30% valuation, 20% new shares (higher dilution in distress)
Secondary today
$13,927
Sale on the secondary market at the typical 15% discount to the mid estimate
These numbers come from the same engine as the live calculator. Walk through with your own grant: use your real numbers →

Transparent assumptions

What we assumed where exact data isn't available. If any of these don't match your situation, the numbers above will be off.

Fully-diluted share count
180M shares
We don't have authoritative cap-table access for private companies. The number above is reconstructed from SEC Form D filings, secondary-market price-vs-valuation math, and leaked share-class summaries. Actual fully-diluted count (including unvested option pool and SAFEs) may differ by 5–15%.
Common-stock waterfall
1.0× to common
We assume a clean common-stock outcome — i.e. preferred-share liquidation preferences and ratchets do not extract value before common. In a down-exit, this assumption can be very wrong: preferred stack can take 30–70% of proceeds.
Private-company illiquidity discount
25% off public peers
Applied to Method A (peer-multiple). Per-company because category leaders with deep secondary markets and a clear IPO path warrant a smaller discount than early-stage names. The literature range is 10–35%; for Whatnot we use 25% based on secondary-market depth, valuation history, and proximity to liquidity.
Revenue growth assumption (Method C)
40% YoY
Compounded forward from the last primary date to today to estimate the company's value drift. Set per-company based on disclosed or reported ARR trajectory. Method C is further capped at 1.3× the most recent secondary trade (if any) to stop runaway extrapolation when revenue growth outpaces what the market is actually paying.
Sector ETF momentum (Method D)
SOCL @ 9%/year
Method D applies the trailing return of SOCL as a market-proxy adjustment to the primary valuation. Crude — meant as a tiebreaker when peer and secondary data conflict, not as a primary signal.
Outlier auto-downweight
Methods >50% from median get ½ weight
Robust-statistics safety net: any method whose output strays more than 50% from the median of the other three methods has its confidence weight halved when computing the blended mid-point. Prevents a single bad extrapolation from dragging the headline.
Recency decay for secondary trades
180-day half-life (e⁻ᵈ/¹⁸⁰)
A trade from 30 days ago counts ~5× more than one from 180 days ago. Tunable; some platforms use shorter half-lives.
Tax estimate
US federal only, single filer
Uses 2024 US federal brackets, ignoring state tax, NIIT, AMT credit recovery, and any other deductions. Treat as a directional sanity check, not a tax bill.
All data from public sources. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not affiliated with Whatnot. Last refreshed manually — see methodology for our update cadence.