PrivatePulse·Companies·CoreWeave vs Miro

CoreWeave vs Miro: employee equity compared

Secondary market prices, valuation trajectory, equity structure, and liquidity outlook for employees choosing between CoreWeave and Miro.

Secondary market data updated monthly · Sources: Hiive, Forge
↑ Higher secondary premium

CoreWeave

Data/Cloud · Roseland, NJ · Founded 2017

Specialised GPU cloud provider purpose-built for AI/ML training and inference — 45,000+ NVIDIA H100s available on-demand.

Last primary round$19B · Series C (2024-05)
Secondary market$19.6B (+3% vs primary)
Annual revenue$2B ARR · +150% YoY (very fast)
Headcount~1,200
Equity typeRSU
Illiquidity discount~15%
Last round leadCoatue Management
Liquidity outlook

IPO plausible 2027–2029 if growth trajectory holds. Liquidity may come via tender offer or strategic acquisition before listing.

Key equity angle

Sticky enterprise ARR; RSU (no exercise cost); IPO imminent when ARR > $1B

Miro

SaaS · United States · Founded 2011

Visual collaboration and online whiteboard platform used by 99% of the Fortune 100 for brainstorming, agile planning, and hybrid workshops.

Last primary round$17.5B · Series C (2022-01)
Secondary market$15.6B (-11% vs primary)
Annual revenue$0.4B ARR · +30% YoY (solid)
Headcount~2,000
Equity typeRSU
Illiquidity discount~20%
Last round leadICONIQ Capital Growth
Liquidity outlook

IPO plausible 2027–2029 if growth trajectory holds. Secondary trades at a discount vs last round — exercise timing requires caution. Liquidity may come via tender offer or strategic acquisition before listing.

Key equity angle

Predictable B2B ARR; RSU (no exercise cost); secondary discount vs primary — price discovery ongoing; exit via IPO or strategic buyer

Key differences for employees

Equity structure

CoreWeave grants RSU — no exercise cost. Your equity vests and converts to cash or shares automatically at a liquidity event. Miro grants RSU — no exercise cost.

Secondary market premium

The secondary market is pricing CoreWeave at a +3% premium over its last primary round ($19B$19.6B). Miro trades at +-11% over its last round ($17.5B$15.6B). A higher secondary premium signals stronger investor demand and potentially better near-term liquidity for employees looking to sell.

Revenue and growth

CoreWeave runs at $2B ARR, growing +150% YoY (very fast). Miro runs at $0.4B ARR, growing +30% YoY (solid). Revenue growth rate matters for equity because it drives the peer-multiple valuation — the method most correlated with exit multiples.

Liquidity timeline

CoreWeave: IPO plausible 2027–2029 if growth trajectory holds. Liquidity may come via tender offer or strategic acquisition before listing.

Miro: IPO plausible 2027–2029 if growth trajectory holds. Secondary trades at a discount vs last round — exercise timing requires caution. Liquidity may come via tender offer or strategic acquisition before listing.

Calculate your specific grant

Enter your actual shares, equity type, and strike price. PrivatePulse calculates your personal equity value at both companies using 4 independent methods.

Frequently asked questions

Is CoreWeave or Miro a better company to work at for equity?
There's no universal answer — it depends on your risk profile, time horizon, and specific grant terms. CoreWeave at $19B and Miro at $17.5B offer very different risk/reward profiles. Use the calculator above to model your exact grant at each company.
How do I know if my CoreWeave or Miro equity is fairly priced?
Compare your grant's implied per-share value against the secondary market price. If investors are paying a premium on Hiive or Forge over the last primary round, that's a signal of strong demand. PrivatePulse shows you the gap between your 409A and what the secondary market says.
Can I sell my CoreWeave or Miro shares on the secondary market?
Secondary market transactions (Hiive, Forge, Caplight) require accredited investor status and your company's consent — most private companies have right-of-first-refusal (ROFR) provisions. Tender offers, when available, are typically the most accessible path to partial liquidity for employees.

More equity comparisons